EIGRP is Cisco’s own proprietary routing protocol. That being said, it’s pretty much a guarantee that you’ll see it in any certification test that deals with routing. Fortunately, it’s a pretty simple protocol to set up for the most part. This article will talk about some of the topics that are more unique to EIGRP.
Neighbor Establishment
Like most modern routing protocols, EIGRP requires neighbor establishment in order for routes to be exchanged. EIGRP has its own rules for two routers to following in order to establish a neighborship. These rules are…
- Authentication process must pass
- AS numbers have to match.
- K values need to match.
- The source IP of the other router’s packets needs to be in the receiving router’s interface primary subnet.
There are a few things that don’t have to match that people sometimes think are requirements. Some of these things are…
- Hello and hold timers
- Neighboring interface subnets
Some routing protocols do require timers to match. EIGRP is not one of them. Also, in terms of timers, here is something to keep in mind. Hello timers for neighbors are locally set. Hold timers are set by the neighboring router for that neighborship.
Also, the subnets not having to match is a common detail that people don’t always know. The requirement says that the source IP of the neighbor’s packets are in the local router interface’s primary subnet. So let’s say router A’s interface has a primary IP and mask of 10.1.1.1/24 and router B’s interface has a primary IP and mask of 10.1.1.10/28. Since 10.1.1.1 is in router B’s 10.1.1.0/28 network, and 10.1.1.10 is in Router A’s 10.1.1.0/24 network, everything is good. But if we changed router B’s IP to 10.1.1.35/28, then router A’s IP of 10.1.1.1 would not be in Router B’s primary 10.1.1.32/28 subnet. So a full neighbor relationship would not be established. The other item of note here is that secondary IPs cannot be used to establish neighborships.
Load Balancing
One of the unique aspects of EIGRP over other common IGPs is unequal cost load balancing. So that will probably be a topic of note on certifications (as well as in production networks). Just to review, EIGRP does equal cost load balancing by default. Using the variance command under the EIGRP routing configuration, you can configure unequal cost load balancing. The biggest requirement here is that only the primary route and other feasible successors can participate in load balancing (to prevent the possibility of routing loops).
So what are some of the methods that can be used to manipulate load balancing? Well, the biggest ones will be controlling route metrics and how many paths will participate.
I terms of controlling route metrics, the best options are controlling the interface bandwidth, delay, and also controlling route offsets. Now controlling interface bandwidth and delay will work just fine. But it’s a little tricky. First, if you are looking to get a route metric to a specific value, it can be tough using this method. Also, changing the bandwidth of the interface can have collateral implications to other things (such as QoS).
Probably the safest method (and arguably easiest) would be to use route offsets. An offset will add a specific number to the metric of a route (or multiple routes). This will allow you to easily get a metric to a certain value. With offsets, you can add metrics on the way in or the way out. You can apply them to everything, or just specific routes using an access list, or by specifying a certain interface. Really, your only limitation is that offsets can only add to the metric, never subtract from it. So if your only option is decreasing the metric, you will need to use the bandwidth/delay manipulations.
The other aspect of load balancing that you may want to be aware of is manipulating how many paths take part in load balancing. Let’s use an example with simple metrics. Say a router has 4 paths to a given network with values of 100, 200, 250, and 300. With the default settings EIGRP will use only a single path, since it only does equal cost load balancing by default. Say you want to load balance over 2 paths. Well, that’s an easy one. Just use the “variance 2” command under the routing configuration, and you’re good to go. Now let’s say that you want to balance over 3 paths. A variance of 2 will include 2 paths, and a variance of 3 would include 4 paths. There are a couple of options here. One would be to increase the metric of the 300 path to something larger. But what if you were prohibited from doing that? Well, then you would want to use the maximum-paths command under the routing configuration. Set a “maximum-paths 3” command, and EIGRP will use the 3 lowest metric paths for load balancing. So even though the variance command includes 4 paths, maximum-paths limits it to using 3.
. Obviously, every company wants to feel that they are the best. Or at least are the best in some facet of their business. Outside of Cisco, who has yet to release their training program, all of these companies have had some pretty good success with helping people to earn their CCIE. So they all must be doing something right in one respect or another.